A philosophic view of why smaller health services may be better than bigger ones. Especially if you live outside the sight-line of those who run the bigger empires in health services. People before machines (especially the ones that go "ping") is always a good start for a health bureaucrat. At least people can tell you that what you are doing for them could be done better!
Showing posts with label SHDGP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SHDGP. Show all posts
Thursday, November 10, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 69
If ever we needed to see what the agenda of the College of GPs (and some of the existing Board members of the Divisions of General Practice) has been in their submissions for ownership of the Medicare Locals, this Media Release spells it out emphatically - "We intend to maintain control because none other than a medical practitioner can do the job of running the Medicare Local".
Local allied health practitioners and community members with health and/or business acumen should be champing at the bit to ensure that they can rein in the entrepreneurial plans of this Juggernaut.
The only way to provide the diverse, effective and efficient community based health services to the Southern Highlands is for the community members delivering and receiving those services to have equality in the decision making of their Medicare Local. Only then will the Vision of the Bankstown Health Coalition be able to be replicated in the Southern Highlands.
7 November 2011
Medicare Locals – GPs must retain a strong leadership role
To avoid fragmentation of patient healthcare, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) urges the Government to consult closely with the medical profession as it progresses the establishment of Medicare Locals.
On Friday, the Minister for Health and Ageing released a list of 38 organisations that have been selected to become the next Medicare Locals.
RACGP President Professor Claire Jackson said that Medicare Locals will have a broader focus than their predecessor Divisions of General Practice, and whilst this should provide a greater opportunity for integrated team based care, it is essential that GPs retain strong leadership roles, and that the general practice is seen as the patient's community healthcare home.
“Quality general practice is the foundation of primary care and must be the basis of Medicare Locals. Our focus needs to remain on enhancement of services to the patient and the community taking care to avoid fragmentation,” she said.
The College is pleased that Minister Roxon acknowledged the importance of ‘GPs and general practice being at the centre of a strong, integrated primary healthcare system’ and the need to ‘build on the excellent work already done by the local Divisions of General Practice’.
“The RACGP believes it is important we remain included in the discussions around the development of each of these organisations and we urge members to remain involved so that general practice continues to be the cornerstone of reform.
“It is likely that the governance of a Medicare Local will be through a skills based board rather than representative based board. GPs with such skills are encouraged to apply and have a voice,” Professor Jackson concluded.
– ends
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 68
There is no doubt that the South West Sydney Health Coalition (SWSHC) and the Bankstown GP Division have been diligent in their attempt to pursue the formation of a collaborative Medicare Local for the region, and magnanimous in defeat!
Not only has the SWSHC outclassed their bigger competitor but they have, in an exlemporary fashion followed the criterion set out for all bidders by the Federal Department of Health and Ageing. They have put to shame their rivals in the Macarthur-Southern Highlands consortium who have failed the critical test of consultation prior to submitting their relevant bids.
One can only hope, as residents and health consumers of the Southern Highlands, that the Vision and ethical approach of the SWSHC is maintained by an appropriate representation from the SWSHC on the Board of the proposed SWS Medicare Local due to commence by 1 July 2012.
Socrates, for one, will find no credibility in a SWSML Board which does not espouse the same SWSHC Vision of : "democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources, to benefit all families across the region."
Welcome to SWSHC

The South West Sydney Health Coalition (SWSHC) formed in 2010, to secure democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources across all parts of the future South West Sydney Medicare Local.
Since 2010, thirty five organisations signed MOUs to work together, to transform this vision of a Medicare Local into reality.
The SWSHC has, from its origins, been driven by a shared vision, of how family doctors, health and community organisations should work together to improve the health of people living between Bankstown and Bowral.

In July 2011, the SWSHC lodged a bid to become the South West Sydney Medicare Local.
On 4 November 2011, we learned that we were not the successful bidder. As a consequence, the SWSHC will negotiate with the Macarthur-Southern Highlands bid consortium to form the South West Sydney Medicare Local.
Importantly, today’s decision means that the SWSHC has not yet secured its original vision – to ensure the South West Sydney Medicare Local foundations rest on democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources, to benefit all families across the region.
Looking towards 2012 and beyond, the SWSHC is now well positioned to represent the interest of family doctors, health organisations, and local communities, to secure our vision for the South West Sydney Medicare Local, through a formal mediation process with the Macarthur and Southern Highlands bid consortium.
Not only has the SWSHC outclassed their bigger competitor but they have, in an exlemporary fashion followed the criterion set out for all bidders by the Federal Department of Health and Ageing. They have put to shame their rivals in the Macarthur-Southern Highlands consortium who have failed the critical test of consultation prior to submitting their relevant bids.
One can only hope, as residents and health consumers of the Southern Highlands, that the Vision and ethical approach of the SWSHC is maintained by an appropriate representation from the SWSHC on the Board of the proposed SWS Medicare Local due to commence by 1 July 2012.
Socrates, for one, will find no credibility in a SWSML Board which does not espouse the same SWSHC Vision of : "democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources, to benefit all families across the region."
Welcome to SWSHC

The South West Sydney Health Coalition (SWSHC) formed in 2010, to secure democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources across all parts of the future South West Sydney Medicare Local.
Since 2010, thirty five organisations signed MOUs to work together, to transform this vision of a Medicare Local into reality.
The SWSHC has, from its origins, been driven by a shared vision, of how family doctors, health and community organisations should work together to improve the health of people living between Bankstown and Bowral.

In July 2011, the SWSHC lodged a bid to become the South West Sydney Medicare Local.
On 4 November 2011, we learned that we were not the successful bidder. As a consequence, the SWSHC will negotiate with the Macarthur-Southern Highlands bid consortium to form the South West Sydney Medicare Local.
Importantly, today’s decision means that the SWSHC has not yet secured its original vision – to ensure the South West Sydney Medicare Local foundations rest on democratic decision making, transparent governance, and equitable distribution of resources, to benefit all families across the region.
Looking towards 2012 and beyond, the SWSHC is now well positioned to represent the interest of family doctors, health organisations, and local communities, to secure our vision for the South West Sydney Medicare Local, through a formal mediation process with the Macarthur and Southern Highlands bid consortium.
Monday, November 7, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 67
TO anticipate what is expected to be delivered by the Sydney South West Medicare Local the only information we health consumers have are these comments by Mr Rene Pennock on the website of the SSW GP Link, the umbrella organisation which includes the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice.
Concerned health practitioners and other health service providers may take comfort from the final dot point in the Division's commentary:
"They will be accountable to local communities to make sure the services are effective and of high quality."
It will become our responsibility to ensure that this accountability is enshrined in this Medicare Local. To do that the health consumers and health care providers need to be proportionately represented on the Board of this Medicare Local.
Already, the GPs on the Boards of the current two Divisions of General Practice (Macarthur and Southern Highlands) are moving to exclude non-GPs on the SSW Medicare Local by suggesting that only GPs have the organisational expertise to manage effectively a Medicare Local.
Well, that's news to me and to other people who have effectively managed health service organisations of even greater magnitude.
What are Medicare Locals?
Medicare
Locals will be primary health care organisations established to
coordinate primary health care delivery and tackle local health care
needs and service gaps.
They will drive improvements in primary health care and ensure that services are better tailored to meet the needs of local communities.
Medicare Locals will have a number of key roles in improving primary health care services for local communities.
They will drive improvements in primary health care and ensure that services are better tailored to meet the needs of local communities.
Medicare Locals will have a number of key roles in improving primary health care services for local communities.
- They will make it easier for patients to access the services they need, by linking local GPs, nursing and other health professionals, hospitals and aged care, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health organisations, and maintaining up to date local service directories.
- They will work closely with Local Hospital Networks to make sure that primary health care services and hospitals work well together for their patients.
- They will plan and support local after hours face-to-face GP services.
- They will identify where local communities are missing out on services they might need and coordinate services to address those gaps.
- They will support local primary care providers, such as GPs, practice nurses and allied health providers, to adopt and meet quality standards.
- They will be accountable to local communities to make sure the services are effective and of high quality.
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 66
THE following message is from the CEO of the SSW-GP-Link and posted on their website
http://www.macdivgp.com.au/site/index.cfm?display=288436
In this statement the CEO says:
"Our start date will be 1st July 2012 which leaves us just over 7 months to implement our plans and listen to the members and community we serve."
In this statement the CEO says:
"Our start date will be 1st July 2012 which leaves us just over 7 months to implement our plans and listen to the members and community we serve."
One is driven to ask the obvious question - "Why didn't you do this before making the collective public of the South West Sydney captive to your plans, Mr Pennock! Now the public must listen to your plans as hatched by your Division and that of the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice!"
What can be suggested is, perhaps, the dis-enfranchised mass of health consumers, private and public healthcare providers, and the managers of the non-government health service sector should take up Mr Pennock's offer and use the Contact Us link to make your voice heard; ask the hard question; or ask the question what are you planning to provide to us in the Wollondilly and Wingecarribee Shires?
Perhaps you would like to start by looking at the scope of the SSW Medicare Local through the Department of Health and Ageing website: www.yourhealth.gov.au
Medicare Local Information
"Sydney South
West GP Link in partnership with our colleagues Southern Highlands
Division of General Practice, is very proud to confirm that on the 4th
November 2011 the Hon Nicola Roxon MP, Minister for Health and Ageing,
announced that we were successful in our application to form the South
Western Sydney Medicare Local (SWSML). We will be one of 62 new Medicare
Locals across the Nation implementing the new Primary Health Care
Reform.
"Our start date will be 1st July 2012 which leaves us just over 7
months to implement our plans and listen to the members and community we
serve. We are also extremely fortunate that South Western Sydney will
have one Medicare Local and one Local Health District. This alone is a
significant step towards improving integration between primary health
care and the hospital system.
"As this link becomes more populated over the next few months please click on Contact Us for
any questions or issues you wish to raise. I strongly encourage anyone
to provide us with any feedback as we move towards our start date on 1st
July 2012."
Rene Pennock
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
The boundaries of each Medicare Local can be viewed at www.yourhealth.gov.au
Medicare Locals to Commence from July 2012
Medicare Local
|
Applicant
|
State/Territory
|
|---|---|---|
| Central Coast NSW | Central Coast Division of General Practice | NSW |
| Eastern Sydney | South Eastern Sydney Division of General Practice | NSW |
| Far West NSW | NSW Outback Division of General Practice | NSW |
| Inner West Sydney | Central Sydney GP Network | NSW |
| South Eastern Sydney | Sutherland Division of General Practice | NSW |
| Southern NSW | Southern GP Network | NSW |
| South Western Sydney | Sydney South West GP Link and Southern Highlands Division of General Practice | NSW |
| Eastern Melbourne | Eastern Ranges GP Association | Victoria |
| Gippsland | East Gippsland Primary Health Alliance, Central West Gippsland Division of General Practice, and General Practice Alliance South Gippsland | Victoria |
| Goulburn Valley | Goulburn Valley Division of General Practice | Victoria |
| Grampians | West Vic Division of General Practice | Victoria |
| Hume | Albury-Wodonga Regional GP Network | Victoria |
| Central Queensland | CQ Medicare Local | Queensland |
| Far North Queensland | Far North Queensland Rural Division of General Practice | Queensland |
| Sunshine Coast | Sunshine Coast Division of General Practice | Queensland |
| Wide Bay | GP Links Wide Bay | Queensland |
| Country South SA | Murray Mallee General Practice Network | South Australia |
| Bentley-Armadale | Canning Division of General Practice | Western Australia |
| Perth Central and East Metro | Perth Primary Care Network | Western Australia |
| Northern Territory | General Practice Network NT, Aboriginal Medical Services Alliance NT and NT Government Department of Health | Northern Territory |
Labels:
DoHA,
Dr Warwick Ruscoe,
Medicare Locals,
Mr Rene Pennock,
SHDGP,
SSW GP Link
Saturday, November 5, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 64
Medicare Locals - Criteria for applicants
Given the apparent failure (again) of the Macarthur - Southern Highlands consortium to gain selection in the second tranche of the successful Medicare Locals announced this week, it is perhaps timely to reproduce here the DoHA selection criteria which the consortium needs to consider for the third tranche to be notified. I suggest to the Boards of the SWSGP Link and the SHDGP that they should consider in particular Criterion 2; and Criterion 4 - 6.
At present, there are clearly significant gaps in the consultation process with key stakeholders and groups that the consortium has been required to have in the development phase of their application. Perhaps they should take a serious look at the way in which the Bankstown GP Division progressed their community consultation process
The relevant consortium Boards need to beat their collective breasts and admit their failure and then, start again!
Given the apparent failure (again) of the Macarthur - Southern Highlands consortium to gain selection in the second tranche of the successful Medicare Locals announced this week, it is perhaps timely to reproduce here the DoHA selection criteria which the consortium needs to consider for the third tranche to be notified. I suggest to the Boards of the SWSGP Link and the SHDGP that they should consider in particular Criterion 2; and Criterion 4 - 6.
At present, there are clearly significant gaps in the consultation process with key stakeholders and groups that the consortium has been required to have in the development phase of their application. Perhaps they should take a serious look at the way in which the Bankstown GP Division progressed their community consultation process
The relevant consortium Boards need to beat their collective breasts and admit their failure and then, start again!
2.4 Selection Criteria
There are six (6) selection criteria against which applications for Medicare Local funding will be assessed. These criteria are outlined below:
Criterion 1:
Demonstrated expertise and capacity to address the five Strategic Objectives for Medicare Locals specified above, for the selected catchment area including outlining:
i. Activities currently undertaken and previous achievements which relate to each of the five strategic objectives;
ii. How these activities can be extended and expanded to meet the needs of a modern primary health care system;
iii. Demonstrated knowledge of the population base, health service architecture and infrastructure, utilisation and other demographic characteristics and health priorities in the proposed catchment area (this should indicate the evidence from which this knowledge is drawn);
iv. A strategy for development of a population and health service plan to address need;
v. Infrastructure already in place;
vi. Capacity to collect and manage data as appropriate;
vii. Strategies for ensuring appropriate accountability and transparency to the community; and
viii. Indicative personnel and other resources to be allocated to deliver these activities.
AND
Criterion 2:
Proposed governance and operational arrangements, including:
i. Details of the proposed legal/corporate and organisational structures;
ii. Experience and skills expertise of the proposed Executive;
iii. A structure that recognises the diversity of clinicians, services and health care recipients within the modern primary health care sector;
iv. Structures that encourage and maintain local engagement and responsiveness;
v. A transition plan, including estimates of costs associated with transition activities;
vi. Strategy for ensuring appropriate clinical governance;
vii. Strategy, skills and expertise to manage flexible funding to target services to the local community’s specific needs;
viii. Strategy for establishing effective linkages with other sectors and organisations, including Local Hospital Networks; and
ix. Strategy for ensuring community engagement and accountability.
The assessment panel will have regard for the desired governance attributes, including broad community and health professional representation, as well as business management expertise; and strong clinical leadership.
AND
Criterion 3:
The financial viability of the Medicare Local including:
i. Demonstrated record in efficient and effective use of funds of each organisation covered by the proposal;
ii. The experience and expertise of the organisation’s proposed executive team to manage substantial public funds appropriately; and
iii. Current contractual arrangements.
AND
Criterion 4:
Demonstrated evidence of ability to engage with and form productive relationships with key stakeholders, providing supporting evidence of any current partnerships and operational arrangements, and strategies to improve engagement with:
i. Community Organisations;
ii. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Organisations;
iii. Workforce Organisations;
iv. General practice;
v. The broader primary health care sector; and
vi. Research Organisations.
AND
Criterion 5:
Strategies and ability to respond to local needs and emerging priorities, including Commonwealth priorities in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health, eHealth and telehealth, mental primary health care, aged care, population health and after hours primary health care.
AND
Criterion 6:
Evidence of ability to build upon a sustained track record of high performance as a Division/s of General Practice or primary health care related organisation, including:
i. Driving improved outcomes and system change in general practice and primary health care through effective practice support;
ii. Improving eHealth and information management infrastructure, including the use of data to improve preventive health and chronic disease management in clinical practice, to measure the effectiveness of health program delivery, and to inform population–based services planning and evaluation;
iii. Effective governance and corporate management;
iv. Demonstrating effective collaborative relationships with other agencies and health service providers to achieved improved referral pathways, health service provision and/ or outcomes, including a demonstrated culture of inclusion across the spectrum of primary health care service provision and local community engagement;
v. Demonstrating compliance with contractual obligations;
vi. Delivering sustained achievement and improvement against national performance indicators for Divisions of General Practice (where relevant) and associated programs; and
vii. Actively sharing expertise and resources with others to promote quality improvement and knowledge transfer across the primary health care sector.
The selection panel will develop a relative merit list from the applications assessed, based on the selection criteria above, and provide recommendations of preferred applicants to the Minister for Health and Ageing.
The selection panel will also have regard to the desirability of achieving a reasonable spread of Medicare Locals across the country and geographic classifications for the first tranche of Medicare Locals.
All applicants should note that, where the assessment process does not identify a preferred applicant within a Medicare Local region, the Department reserves the right to broker an arrangement between funding applicants and/or other interested parties.
Friday, November 4, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 63
Second wave of Medicare Locals announced
- By Michael Woodhead on 4 November 2011 - 6Minutes
An additional 38 Medicare Locals have been announced by Health Minister Nicola Roxon today.
However, only 18 of the new Medicare Locals will be established from 1 January 2012, while the remaining 20 will be part of a third wave of 25 Medicare Locals to commence from 1 July 2012.
In total there will be 62 Medicare Locals, including the 19 that have already been announced and which are in the process of being established from “high performing”divisions of general practice.
The Medicare Locals to start in January are:
NSW: Illawarra-Shoalhaven, Nepean-Blue Mountains, North Coast NSW, Northern Sydney and Western NSW;
Victoria: Bayside, Frankston-Mornington Peninsula, Loddon-Mallee-Murray, Lower Murray Macedon Ranges and North Western Melbourne, South Eastern Melbourne;
Queensland: Central and North West Queensland, Darling Downs- South West Queensland;
South Australia: Northern Adelaide, Southern Adelaide-Fleurieu;
WA: Fremantle, Goldfields-Midwest, Rockingham-Kwinana-Peel.
Health minister Nicola Roxon said further work was needed for Medicare Locals for North Eastern Sydney and Hunter Rural in NSW, Great South Coast and South Western Melbourne in Victoria and Kimberley-Pilbara in Western Australia.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 62
The big sell(out)! - SSWGP Link + SHDGP
At various times, and in previous posts, Socrates has made reference to the relationship formed between the Macarthur Division of General Practice (now the Sydney South West GP Link) and the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice. For the former, the collaboration is about its further expansionist aims. For the latter, it is all about making sure that some people remain employed.
At various times, and in previous posts, Socrates has made reference to the relationship formed between the Macarthur Division of General Practice (now the Sydney South West GP Link) and the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice. For the former, the collaboration is about its further expansionist aims. For the latter, it is all about making sure that some people remain employed.
But....... does it mean that people in the Southern Highlands will get an improved health service? This is the crucial question to which we have not had an answer simply because we have not had the level of community consultation and public meetings - or the involvement of all the non-government organisations, or the local private and public healthcare providers, or the health consumers in our local community - that the Federal Department of Health and Ageing (DoHA) had required prior to the lodgement of any application by the Macarthur-Southern Highlands consortium.
It is little point in suggesting that the Southern Highland's meek and mild health consumers and health practitioners and NGOs should be happy that the consortium would inform everyone of the details after the event. That still does not comply in any way with the DoHA mandated requirements prescribed in the documentation for submitting for funding of a Medicare Local.
Is BIGGER simply the BEST? How can a consortium, which will control some 700+ GPs over some 320+ practices, possibly provide, or even broker, the most effective and efficient health service to the 40,000+ people of the Southern Highlands?
From its own website description, the Sydney South West GP Link demonstrates and boasts that it is a business seeking "to trade nationally and internationally" and has expansionist aims.
Do the health consumers in the Southern Highlands really want to compete with other health consumers in the national or international arena? I think not!
History of the Division
"Macarthur
Division of General Practice (MDGP) was established in August 1993 as
an unincorporated association known at that time as Campbelltown
Division of General Practice.
"MDGP was incorporated in 1994 as Macarthur Division of General Practice Inc.
"MDGP's first premises were in Campbelltown Hospital where the Division functioned essentially as part of the Campbelltown Health Service.
"In 1995, MDGP moved to office premises in the Campbelltown CBD area and to the present building in 1996.
"MDGP
was also preceded by the unincorporated Macarthur General Practice
Association (MGPA) whose main purpose was to provide an educational
service for local GPs.
This body continued until 1998 when its role was formally taken over by MDGP.
"MDGP became a registered Company Limited by Guarantee as of 27th June 2005.
This enables the business to trade nationally and internationally as the company evolves.
"As of 1st July 2009, MDGP was successful in an open tender process, to run General Practice support services in the Liverpool and Fairfield regions. This effectively expanded the business of our support services to the Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Liverpool, Fairfield, Campbelltown, Camden
and Wollondilly. Our catchment now includes some 600 General
Practitioners working in over 280 practices across this large region.
"With our expansion, our members and
stakeholders suggested a name change to better reflect the geographical
regions we covered.
"Also in late 2010 the Southern Highlands Division of
General Practice (SHDGP) expressed a wish to merge with us in
recognition that both organisations could better serve their members
under one umbrella.
"With these issues in mind, at an extra ordinary
general meeting held on 30th June 2011, our Division changed its name to
Sydney South West GP Link effective from 1st July 2011.
"We continue to
work with SHDGP to progress the merger."
SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 61
Medicare Local 'takeover' dispute
- By Michael Woodhead on 28 October 2011 - 6Minutes
The merger of two GP divisions into a Medicare Local has turned acrimonious, with the Murrumbidgee General Practice Network (MGPN) claiming that it has been subject to a takeover by its neighbouring Riverina division.
The CEO of the MGPN says the Riverina division, chaired by former AGPN leader Dr Tony Hobbs, “unilaterally negotiated with DoHA without the MGPN's knowledge and exclusively executed the Medicare Local contracts for themselves."
Despite formal complaints to DoHA and ASIC about the “breach of trust” the Riverina’s conduct was not deemed illegal, the local newspaper (link) reports.
According to The Irrigator, the Murumbidgee Medicare Local was planned to be a merger of the Murrumbidgee General Practice Network and the Riverina Division of General Practice and Primary Health.
However, in the annual report for the Murrumbidgee General Practice Network, CEO Keith McDonald says the Riverina division secured secured a controlling interest of the consortium, without consultation.
"Though MGPN has subesquently pursued serious formal complaints through numerous channels on this breach of trust, there has been no remedy and subsequent arbitration concluded that, technically, the RDGP&PH's conduct was not illegal.
"With DoHA's continued insistence on endorsing RDGP&PH as the lead agent in establishing the Medicare Local, the process has now firmed as a takeover rather than a merger," he writes.
Mr McDonald says the takeover and the loss of Commonwealth funding for the division means there are now doubts about the future of local offices and programs.
Hmmmmm! Something about this does seem to ring alarm bells with another such amalgamation. Perhaps the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice might like to consider their current position with their Macarthur colleagues. It could be a matter of history repeating itself.
Monday, October 24, 2011
SWSLHD and Bowral's Health - 41
Mental health nurses improve access
- By Gemma Collins on 24 October 2011 - 6Minutes
Incorporating mental health nurses into general practice can lead to better outcomes for patients and GPs, but a shortage of these specialist nurses could make it difficult to expand the program, a pilot scheme has found.
A four-year program, which involved mental health nurses working with GPs and private psychiatrists in five states, was found to have “significantly improved” access to appropriate mental health services, a report has revealed (link).
More than 40,500 people received a service through the $191.6m Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) from 2007-2011, in a range of areas which ranged from one nurse supporting one practice to seven nurses supporting 29 practices, according to the recently released report.
The authors say the program led to earlier intervention, shorter admissions and better follow-up with patients receiving mental health services in “convenient and non-stigmatising settings”.
GPs said they felt better supported in their work with mentally ill patients and said their knowledge and confidence had improved.
Out of the 57 patients who were surveyed, 80% reported improvements in their mental health and almost half reported improvements in their social relationships.
The government has since announced it will allocate a further $13m over two years to employ an additional 136 mental health nurses.
But the limited availability of ‘credentialed’ nurses, particularly in rural areas, could make it difficult for the program to expand, the authors say.
The funding which was based around a fixed payment per half day session was also found to be a deterrent, as it did not allow for any additional costs including computers or professional development and for the extra time needed to get around rural areas.
Now here is an interesting tale! I'm told that the Southern Highlands still has only one Credentialed Mental Health Nurse who provides this service. Other's have tried to enter the SH area to also provide the service but have not been supported by .... you guessed it !... the CEO of the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice..... who suggests it may be due instead to the others not being able to market themselves to the GPs. I guess it does not help if the CEO informs the GPs who are interested that they would be more open to being audited and other bits of misinformation guaranteed to turn off even the most ardent advocate for the program. The fact remains that since the failure of their own staff member in achieving credentialed mental health nurse status, the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice has taken their bat and ball and left the MHNIP field of play.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)