Monday, June 6, 2011

SSWAHS = SWSLHD + SLHD and the Medicare Locals - 49

Socrates says that it would appear that someone in Nicola Roxon's office has gotten the message that in the Southern Highlands there was sufficient "Southern Dis-Comfort" about the way in which the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice has approached the whole concept of Medicare Locals.

Perhaps now, the Board and CEO of the Southern Highlands Division of General Practice will undertake the basic principle of the Medicare Locals funding parameters and commence to speak with the public and private healthcare providers in the area, and the NGOs, to develop a collaborative model of health care in the Southern Highlands. Then, and only then, will they comply with the basic requirements for funding. The clock is ticking... and by July 1st 2012, the SH Division of General Practice will cease to exist.

Strangely enough, someone seems to have objected to the re-publication of the information of this publicly available information from the Medical Observer in which their author reports the content of a media release of the successful tenderers for the first of the Medicare Locals.

One can only speculate about who that might be. Socrates has yet to be given the answer to that question, and to the other as to how a publicly issued media release and publication can allegedly infringe copyright......!?

Roxon unveils first Medicare Locals

6th Jun 2011 - Medical Observer
Byron Kaye   all articles by this author
THE first 15 Medicare Locals have been unveiled by Health Minister Nicola Roxon, however Victoria has been left off the list as the Baillieu Government holds out on wider health reform.

The first tranche of MLs are split between the states, with four successful tenders named in NSW and five in Queensland.

Victoria’s absence has led the AGPN to call on the Victorian divisions to put pressure the Baillieu Government to sign up to the reform as soon as possible.

Four MLs have been earmarked by the Federal Government for Victoria, however the Baillieu Government requested extra time to consider the ML boundaries in its state. It is expected the four will be officially announced next week.

The situation has led AGPN CEO David Butt to issue an email to all divisions – which MO has obtained – to explain the situation, which he describes as “disruptive and farcical”.

“While this means that these four will definitely go ahead as planned, it now leaves a level of uncertainty about potential boundary changes for other Victorian MLs,” Mr Butt wrote.

“By the end of last week, the Federal Government’s plan was to proceed with two additional MLs in Victoria. Unfortunately, we now no longer have that certainty.

“If any of you from Victoria can bring any pressure to bear on the Victorian Government to stop the delays and allow the primary healthcare reforms to get going, then please do so.”

Announcing the MLs, Health Minister Nicola Roxon said the first round of successful applicants were chosen for their established records in improving primary healthcare for their local community and strong plans to improve local primary care services into the future.

The successful applicants are as follows:
Comments:
SMS
6th Jun 2011
4:38pm
Nothing good will come out of this for the average gp .
I am going to retire .
Rob the Physician
6th Jun 2011
4:45pm
MORE political interference in OUR health systems !!! e
Gerard Matthew
6th Jun 2011
5:12pm
The public don't seem to get it. If you tax the people and give it back as "benefits" there is a huge cost of bureaucracy to administer it with another layer to monitor the adminstration with the result that much less really helps the people targeted for the "benefits". Too much money goes to bureaucracitic empires rather than to the people who really need it.
khanGP
6th Jun 2011
5:43pm
The Divisions of General purport to represent the Voice of its Members. In reality, they do not. They do not seek the Individual GP Members' points of View on Important Developments, by way of conducting regular FAX / E-MAIL Surveys. Surveys with simple Questions - eg. Tick a ' Yes ' or a ' No ' to the Question - ' Do you wish your Division to be involved with the formation of 'Medicare Locals ' ?
I challenge each Division to pose such a Question to its Members & find out for themselves, the TRUTH - i.e. The majority of GPs do not want their Division to be involved in the formation of ' Medicare Locals '.
GPs are inundated at work & do not have time to attend Meetings - a Quick FAX / E-MAIL Survey is the way to go.
I believe the Divisions & the AGPN have betrayed their GP Members.
DR. AHAD KHAN
G.P. GLENBROOK NSW
Biggles
6th Jun 2011
6:24pm
who knows whats a medicare local?

Ive been living 3 minutes from my surgery, usually know the names of most of the school captains and prefercts and the primary school etc etc, and have been into probably 1 in 4 houses in the district over the last 20 years - medicare could NEVER be that local... dream on.........
Dr T
6th Jun 2011
7:05pm
"You're not having any dessert unless you finish your greens!"

How typical of the federal government to wave a big at over Victoria. No, it's not a carrot. And David Butt is wrong. The states have the right to determine what happens with their state health dept funding. We still have state governments David. Until they do away with them the federal government is just the paymaster. The federal government would be acting inappropriately if it withheld primary care funding on the basis of state health decision making. Everyone knows that. Come on.